4.7 Article

Interface description of Milli-Q water cells: Temperature dependence of the CPE parameters

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 777, 期 -, 页码 19-25

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.06.036

关键词

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy; Interface; CPE; Milli-Q water

资金

  1. CAPES - Brazilian Federal Agency for Support and Evaluation of Graduate Education within the Ministry of Education of Brazil
  2. Competitiveness Program of NRNU MEPhI
  3. Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research, CNCS UEFISCDI Project [PN-II-ID-PCE-2011-3-0535]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We report on the temperature dependence of the Milli-Q water cell response, limited by surgical steel electrodes, to an external periodic excitation. Using the Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy technique (EIS), the spectra of the real and imaginary parts of the electrical impedance of the cell are experimentally obtained. Important deviations from the theoretical predictions of the Poisson-Nernst-Planck model, assuming blocking electrodes, are observed. Our experimental results indicate that the properties of the electrodes play an important role in the low frequency part of the spectra. In the absence of a simple physically based theoretical model, we fit our data utilizing three equivalent electric circuits containing a constant phase element (CPE) charged to describe the properties of the electrodes. From our analysis it follows that a good equivalent electric circuit for the analysis of the response of an electrolytic cell to an external periodic voltage is formed by a parallel of a bulk capacitance and resistance of ionic origin. The CPE is then charged to mimic the interface effects. From a mathematical point of view this is equivalent to assume that the phenomenological parameters describing the non-ideal blocking properties of the electrode, in the Chang-Jaffe, Ohmic or Langmuir models, are frequency dependent. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据