4.7 Article

MOFs as reactant: In situ synthesis of Li2ZnTi3O8@C-N nanocomposites as high performance anodes for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ELECTROANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 775, 期 -, 页码 311-319

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jelechem.2016.06.024

关键词

Metal-organic frameworks; Lithium-ion battery; In situ synthesis; Anode; Li2ZnTi3O8@C-N nanocomposites

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [201401111, 21271098, 21301100]
  2. Henan Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [U1504532]
  3. Ministry of Science and Technology of China (973 Project) [2014CB660804]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Nanyang Normal University [ZX2014038, ZX2014045]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Henan Department of Science Technology [0611023600, 152102210337]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lithium zinc titanate (Li2ZnTi3O8) is a desirable anode material for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to its low cost, non-toxicity and high safety. However, the low electronic conductivity and inferior rate capability hinder the commercial application of Li2ZnTi3O8. Carbon coating can not only effectively enhance the electronic conductivity of Li2ZnTi3O8 but also suppress the growth of particle size in the sintering process. In addition, carbon can provide extra capacity when using Li2ZnTi3O8/C as an anode. Here, a simple yet powerful strategy is introduced to in situ prepare nitrogen-doped carbon coating on Li2ZnTi3O8 nanoparticles using ZIF-8 as carbon, nitrogen and zinc sources. After sintering at 700 degrees C the obtained nanocomposite shows large discharge specific capacity of 2873 mA h g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1), excellent cycling stability (>90% capacity retention after 200 cycles corresponding to the largest value at 2 A g(-1)) and outstanding rate capability at 4 and 5 A g(-1). These properties, combined with its high safety and ease of fabrication, make such Li2ZnTi3O8@C-N nanocomposite an ideal anode candidate for LIBs. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据