4.4 Article

Diagnosis and minimally invasive treatment of type III choledochal cysts

期刊

BMC SURGERY
卷 22, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12893-022-01713-w

关键词

Type III choledochal cysts; Minimally invasive treatment; Laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy; Choledochocele; Case report

类别

资金

  1. Ministry of Health Project Foundation of Jilin Province [2016J058]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Type III choledochal cysts are the rarest variant of biliary cysts and lack a gold standard treatment. This study presents an unusual case of Type III choledochal cyst and confirms the diagnosis through ERCP. The patient underwent surgical treatment with a good outcome.
Background Type III choledochal cysts (CCs) are the rarest and least well-characterized of the five variants of biliary cysts. Only a few relevant studies have been conducted and a gold standard treatment for type III CCs is still lacking because of their scarcity. An unusual case of type III CC with choledochocele at the end of the distal common bile duct (CBD) with no bulging of the duodenum is presented here. Case presentation A 61-year-old woman presented to our department with repeated upper abdominal pain for one year. Laboratory examination revealed abnormal liver function and a slight increase in the white blood cell (WBC) count and proportion of neutrophils. In an MRCP of the patient, the distal CBD was found to have a cystic structure indicative of a type III CC. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatograpy (ERCP) revealed cystic findings compatible with Todani type III CCs. However, duodenoscopy did not show a bulge in the duodenum so laparoscopic cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy were performed. In her 6-month follow-up, the patient reported that recovery from the operation was uneventful. Conclusions ERCP has become the gold standard for diagnosing type III CCs. Type III CCs can be treated minimally invasively with laparoscopic cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据