4.8 Article

An analysis of 45 large-scale wastewater sites in England to estimate SARS-CoV-2 community prevalence

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31753-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. UKHSA
  2. UK Natural Environment Research Council National under the COVID-19 Wastewater Epidemiology Surveillance Programme [NE/V010441/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes wastewater data from 45 sites in England to estimate the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2, and the results are within 1.1% of estimates from representative surveys. It is found that wastewater surveillance can detect viral signals earlier than clinical testing data and serves as a leading indicator for symptomatic viral infections. This research highlights the significance of wastewater surveillance in complementing clinical surveillance and its implications for public health.
Accurate surveillance of the COVID-19 pandemic can be weakened by under-reporting of cases, particularly due to asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic infections, resulting in bias. Quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater can be used to infer infection prevalence, but uncertainty in sensitivity and considerable variability has meant that accurate measurement remains elusive. Here, we use data from 45 sewage sites in England, covering 31% of the population, and estimate SARS-CoV-2 prevalence to within 1.1% of estimates from representative prevalence surveys (with 95% confidence). Using machine learning and phenomenological models, we show that differences between sampled sites, particularly the wastewater flow rate, influence prevalence estimation and require careful interpretation. We find that SARS-CoV-2 signals in wastewater appear 4-5 days earlier in comparison to clinical testing data but are coincident with prevalence surveys suggesting that wastewater surveillance can be a leading indicator for symptomatic viral infections. Surveillance for viruses in wastewater complements and strengthens clinical surveillance, with significant implications for public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据