4.8 Article

Terrigenous dissolved organic matter persists in the energy-limited deep groundwaters of the Fennoscandian Shield

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32457-z

关键词

-

资金

  1. Uppsala Multidisciplinary Center for Advanced Computational Science (UPPMAX) at Uppsala University [SNIC 2021/22-628, SNIC 2021/6-256]
  2. Swedish Research Council [2016-07213, 2018-04311]
  3. Vinnova [2018-04311] Funding Source: Vinnova
  4. Swedish Research Council [2018-04311] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The deep terrestrial biosphere encompasses life below the photosynthesis-fueled surface that survives in nutrient and energy depleted anoxic groundwaters. This study reveals the presence of terrestrially-sourced carbon in deep continental groundwater and its support for deep microbial life.
The deep terrestrial biosphere encompasses the life belowthe photosynthesisfueled surface that perseveres in typically nutrient and energy depleted anoxic groundwaters. The composition and cycling of this vast dissolved organic matter (DOM) reservoir relevant to the global carbon cycle remains to be deciphered. Here we show that recent Baltic Sea-influenced to ancient preHolocene saline Fennoscandian Shield deep bedrock fracture waters carried DOM with a strong terrigenous signature and varying contributions from abiotic and biotic processes. Removal of easily degraded carbon at the surfaceto-groundwater transition and corresponding microbial community assembly processes likely resulted in the highly similar DOM signatures across the notably different water types that selected for a core microbiome. In combination with the aliphatic character, depleted d13C signatures in DOM indicated recent microbial production in the oldest, saline groundwater. Our study revealed the persistence of terrestrially-sourced carbon in severely energy limited deep continental groundwaters supporting deep microbial life.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据