4.8 Article

Three-dimensional electron ptychography of organic-inorganic hybrid nanostructures

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-32548-x

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11874199, 21991134, 21934007, 92056117]
  2. NSFC [92056117, 11911530174]
  3. University of Warwick Research Development Fund (RDF) 2021-22 Science Development Award
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20210187]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Fundation [2022M711564]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the use of electron ptychography to recover high contrast phase information from a DNA origami scaffold without staining. The results show that electron ptychography can simultaneously resolve the organic and inorganic components in the DNA scaffold, with higher contrast compared to conventional transmission electron microscopy.
Three dimensional scaffolded DNA origami with inorganic nanoparticles has been used to create tailored multidimensional nanostructures. However, the image contrast of DNA is poorer than those of the heavy nanoparticles in conventional transmission electron microscopy at high defocus so that the biological and non-biological components in 3D scaffolds cannot be simultaneously resolved using tomography of samples in a native state. We demonstrate the use of electron ptychography to recover high contrast phase information from all components in a DNA origami scaffold without staining. We further quantitatively evaluate the enhancement of contrast in comparison with conventional transmission electron microscopy. In addition, We show that for ptychography post-reconstruction focusing simplifies the workflow and reduces electron dose and beam damage. The authors demonstrate electron ptychographic computed tomography by simultaneously recording high contrast data from both the organic- and inorganic components in a 3D DNA-origami framework hybrid nanostructure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据