4.8 Article

Pseudomonas aeruginosa SutA wedges RNAP lobe domain open to facilitate promoter DNA unwinding

期刊

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 13, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-31871-7

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0900701]
  2. CAS Strategic Priority Research Program [XDB29020000]
  3. Shanghai Science and technology innovation program [19JC1415900]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31970040, 31670067, 31822001]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LR21C010002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the mechanism of SutA's action on RNAP. Cryo-EM structures reveal how SutA assists RNAP in unwinding the promoter DNA. These findings are significant for understanding the function of SutA and the transcription regulation mechanism during bacterial infection.
SutA is a transcription factor which increases transcription activity of an RNA polymerase (RNAP). Here, authors present cryo-EM structures of SutA-bound RNAP-sigma(S) holoenzyme and SutA-bound transcription initiation complex, which reveals SutA wedging the RNAP-beta lobe open to aid unwinding. Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Pae) SutA adapts bacteria to hypoxia and nutrition-limited environment during chronic infection by increasing transcription activity of an RNA polymerase (RNAP) holoenzyme comprising the stress-responsive sigma factor sigma(S) (RNAP-sigma(S)). SutA shows no homology to previously characterized RNAP-binding proteins. The structure and mode of action of SutA remain unclear. Here we determined cryo-EM structures of Pae RNAP-sigma(S) holoenzyme, Pae RNAP-sigma(S) holoenzyme complexed with SutA, and Pae RNAP-sigma(S) transcription initiation complex comprising SutA. The structures show SutA pinches RNAP-beta protrusion and facilitates promoter unwinding by wedging RNAP-beta lobe open. Our results demonstrate that SutA clears an energetic barrier to facilitate promoter unwinding of RNAP-sigma(S) holoenzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据