4.2 Article

A new crocodylomorph related ootaxon from the late Maastrichtian of the Southern Pyrenees (Huesca, Spain)

期刊

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 8, 页码 1460-1469

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2022.2098024

关键词

Crocodylomorpha; Krokolithidae; eggshell fragments; Tremp Basin; Late Cretaceous

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reports the discovery of crocodylomorph eggshell fragments from a new fossil site in the Southern Pyrenees and establishes a new genus of crocodylomorph eggs based on their morphological features. The study also identifies similar eggshells from an earlier locality in the same region. The Late Cretaceous Tremp Basin had a diverse range of crocodylomorph taxa, making it difficult to attribute the newly established genus to a single clade.
Crocodylomorph eggs and eggshells are known as old as the Late Jurassic and are frequent components of most multiootaxic eggshell assemblages. Classified within the oofamily Krokolithidae, thei histo- and ultrastructures are conservative throughout geological time, characterised by inverted-trapezoid-shaped shell units that grow from highly spaced basal knobs and present a diagnostic tabular ultrastructure. Here, we report 327 eggshell fragments from a new fossil site from the Maastrichtian of the Southern Pyrenees, Veracruz 1, and erect a new oogenus and oospecies, Pachykrokolithus excavatum oogen. et oosp. nov. characterised by crocodyloid morphotype and a prominent rugosocavate ornamentation. Eggshells from the slightly older locality of Blasi 2b, previously reported as aff. Krokolithidae, are also assigned to this new ootaxon. Different crocodylomorph taxa coexisted during the Late Cretaceous of the Tremp Basin, hindering the attribution of Pachykrokolithus excavatum oogen. et oosp. nov. to a single clade. Nevertheless, allodaposuchid eusuchians were dominant in this ecosystem, and are the most probable producers of Pachykrokolithus excavatum oogen. et oosp. nov. eggs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据