4.2 Article

First eurhinodelphinid dolphin from the Paratethys reveals a new family of specialised echolocators

期刊

HISTORICAL BIOLOGY
卷 35, 期 7, 页码 1074-1091

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08912963.2022.2077645

关键词

Odontoceti; cochlea; 90var; head movements; hearing; echolocation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes a new specimen of Xiphiacetus cristatus from the Middle Miocene of Austria, which is the first record of this species outside the North Atlantic proper, and the first unequivocal record of eurhinodelphinids from the Paratethys. Measurements of the bony labyrinth suggest that X. cristatus likely employed narrow-band high-frequency echolocation, making it one of only two extinct odontocete families with this trait. The non-orthogonality of the semicircular canals indicates that X. cristatus was more likely a benthic forager than a snap feeder.
Eurhinodelphinids are a family of extremely long-snouted dolphins that once was widespread across the North Atlantic realm, but so far has not been recorded from the epicontinental Paratethys Sea. Here, we describe a new specimen of Xiphiacetus cristatus, including the cranium, left ear bones and a partial mandible, from the Middle Miocene (Badenian) of Austria. Our new fossil is the first record of this species outside the North Atlantic proper, and the first unequivocal record of eurhinodelphinids from the Paratethys. Its presence suggests a local invasion via the Mediterranean, and corroborates the persistence of an active marine gateway between the Mediterranean and the Central Paratethys throughout the Middle Miocene. Measurements of the bony labyrinth reveal that X. cristatus likely employed narrow-band high-frequency echolocation, making eurhinodelphinids only the second extinct odontocete family with this trait. Marked non-orthogonality of the semicircular canals suggests that X. cristatus was unsuited to rapid head movements, and thus more likely a benthic forager than a snap feeder.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据