4.6 Article

Borneol Ester Derivatives as Entry Inhibitors of a Wide Spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 Viruses

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14061295

关键词

SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus surface protein S-spike; pseudoviral system; terpene; borneol; molecular dynamics; molecular docking

类别

资金

  1. RFBR [20-04-60038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we investigated the antiviral activity of a home library of monoterpenoid derivatives using pseudoviral systems. We identified borneol derivatives with a tertiary nitrogen atom as potential inhibitors of early viral replication. Further biological tests and studies revealed two lead compounds that showed activity against multiple strains of SARS-CoV-2. Molecular dynamics and docking methods were employed to predict the potential binding sites of the lead compounds, suggesting conserved regions of the glycoprotein S of the virus.
In the present work we studied the antiviral activity of the home library of monoterpenoid derivatives using the pseudoviral systems of our development, which have glycoproteins of the SARS-CoV-2 virus strains Wuhan and Delta on their surface. We found that borneol derivatives with a tertiary nitrogen atom can exhibit activity at the early stages of viral replication. In order to search for potential binding sites of ligands with glycoprotein, we carried out additional biological tests to study the inhibition of the re-receptor-binding domain of protein S. For the compounds that showed activity on the pseudoviral system, a study using three strains of the infectious SARS-CoV-2 virus was carried out. As a result, two leader compounds were found that showed activity on the Wuhan, Delta, and Omicron strains. Based on the biological results, we searched for the potential binding site of the leader compounds using molecular dynamics and molecular docking methods. We suggested that the compounds can bind in conserved regions of the central helices and/or heptad repeats of glycoprotein S of SARS-CoV-2 viruses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据