4.6 Review

Beyond Amyloid Fibers: Accumulation, Biological Relevance, and Regulation of Higher-Order Prion Architectures

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14081635

关键词

amyloid; amyloidosis; prion; [PSI+]; fibril; protofibrils

类别

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R35 GM118042]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The formation of amyloid fibers is associated with various diseases and phenotypic conditions, and they can assemble into multi-protofibril and high-order architectures. Using prion propagation in yeast as a model, researchers can explore the connection between these aggregation states and the biological consequences of amyloid dynamics.
The formation of amyloid fibers is associated with a diverse range of disease and phenotypic states. These amyloid fibers often assemble into multi-protofibril, high-order architectures in vivo and in vitro. Prion propagation in yeast, an amyloid-based process, represents an attractive model to explore the link between these aggregation states and the biological consequences of amyloid dynamics. Here, we integrate the current state of knowledge, highlight opportunities for further insight, and draw parallels to more complex systems in vitro. Evidence suggests that high-order fibril architectures are present ex vivo from disease relevant environments and under permissive conditions in vivo in yeast, including but not limited to those leading to prion formation or instability. The biological significance of these latter amyloid architectures or how they may be regulated is, however, complicated by inconsistent experimental conditions and analytical methods, although the Hsp70 chaperone Ssa1/2 is likely involved. Transition between assembly states could form a mechanistic basis to explain some confounding observations surrounding prion regulation but is limited by a lack of unified methodology to biophysically compare these assembly states. Future exciting experimental entryways may offer opportunities for further insight.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据