4.6 Article

A Deeper Insight into Evolutionary Patterns and Phylogenetic History of ORF Virus through the Whole Genome Sequencing of the First Italian Strains

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14071473

关键词

ORFV; molecular dating; Sardinia; genome types

类别

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of Health [RC IZSSA 03/20]
  2. Fondazione di Sardegna

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used Italian whole genomes to infer the evolutionary history of ORFV. The results revealed that ORFV originated in Europe and Asia in the late 18th century and spread throughout the European continent in the early 20th century. The Italian strains isolated from Sardinia may represent early European forms of ORFV.
Orf virus (ORFV) is distributed worldwide and is the causative agent of contagious ecthyma that mainly occurs in sheep and goats. This disease was reported for the first time at the end of 18th century in Europe but very little is currently known about the temporal and geographic origins of this virus. In the present study, the use of new Italian whole genomes allowed for better inference on the evolutionary history of ORFV. In accordance with previous studies, two genome types (S and G) were described for infection of sheep and goats, respectively. These two well-differentiated groups of genomes originated for evolutive convergence in the late 1800s in two different areas of the world (Europe for S type and Asia for G type), but it was only in the early 1900s that the effective size of ORFV increased among hosts and the virus spread across the whole European continent. The Italian strains which were sequenced in the present study were isolated on the Mediterranean island of Sardinian and showed to be exclusive to this geographic area. One of them is likely representative of the early European forms of ORFV which infected sheep and became extinct about one century ago. Such an ancient Sardinian strain may have reached the island simple by chance, where it quickly adapted to the new habitat.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据