4.6 Article

Tryptophan Residues Are Critical for Portal Protein Assembly and Incorporation in Bacteriophage P22

期刊

VIRUSES-BASEL
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v14071400

关键词

virus assembly; DNA packaging; dsDNA virus; terminase

类别

资金

  1. NIH [R01GM076661, R01GM 131100]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates the crucial role of specific tryptophan residues within the wing domain of the bacteriophage P22 portal protein in its function and assembly.
The oligomerization and incorporation of the bacteriophage P22 portal protein complex into procapsids (PCs) depends upon an interaction with scaffolding protein, but the region of the portal protein that interacts with scaffolding protein has not been defined. In herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1), conserved tryptophan residues located in the wing domain are required for portal-scaffolding protein interactions. In this study, tryptophan residues (W) present at positions 41, 44, 207 and 211 within the wing domain of the bacteriophage P22 portal protein were mutated to both conserved and non-conserved amino acids. Substitutions at each of these positions were shown to impair portal function in vivo, resulting in a lethal phenotype by complementation. The alanine substitutions caused the most severe defects and were thus further characterized. An analysis of infected cell lysates for the W to A mutants revealed that all the portal protein variants except W211A, which has a temperature-sensitive incorporation defect, were successfully recruited into procapsids. By charge detection mass spectrometry, all W to A mutant portal proteins were shown to form stable dodecameric rings except the variant W41A, which dissociated readily to monomers. Together, these results suggest that for P22 conserved tryptophan, residues in the wing domain of the portal protein play key roles in portal protein oligomerization and incorporation into procapsids, ultimately affecting the functionality of the portal protein at specific stages of virus assembly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据