4.3 Article

Type specimens of birds in the Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Norway

期刊

ZOOTAXA
卷 5150, 期 4, 页码 451-486

出版社

MAGNOLIA PRESS
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5150.4.1

关键词

Avian types; NHMO; Robert Collett; Yngvar Hagen; Adolf Bernhard Meyer; Tommaso Salvadori; Australia; Tristan da Cunha; New Guinea; Tanimbar Islands; Aru Islands

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article presents a list of all known bird type specimens in the collection of the Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Norway. The specimens come from northern Australia, eastern Indonesia, or Tristan da Cunha, and have been either collected and described by personnel associated with the museum or sent from other museums in exchange for other specimens. The catalog is not intended for taxonomic revisions but refutes the type status of some specimens. The collection includes name-bearing types of 11 taxa, comprising one holotype and 26 syntypes; two paratypes from the same type series as the holotype; and one paralectotype of a twelfth taxon. The catalog also includes two specimens of one taxon here refuted as being type specimens.
A list of all known bird type specimens in the collection of the Natural History Museum, University of Oslo, Norway is presented. The specimens originate from northern Australia, eastern Indonesia or Tristan da Cunha, and have either been collected and described by personnel associated with the museum or sent from other museums in exchange for other specimens. The catalogue is not intended as a taxonomic revision of the treated taxa, and consequently no taxonomic revisions are made, but the type status of some specimens formerly considered to be types is refuted. The collection holds name-bearing types of 11 taxa, comprising one holotype and 26 syntypes; two paratypes from the same type series as the holotype; and one paralectotype of a twelfth taxon. The catalogue also includes two specimens of one taxon here refuted as being type specimens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据