4.6 Review

Endoscopic salvage therapy after failed biliary cannulation using advanced techniques: A concise review

期刊

WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY
卷 28, 期 29, 页码 3803-3813

出版社

BAISHIDENG PUBLISHING GROUP INC
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i29.3803

关键词

Difficult biliary cannulation; Endoscopic ultrasound; Rendezvous; Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage; Interval

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This review discusses potential endoscopic options for patients who have failed ERCP due to difficult bile duct cannulation, including interval ERCP, PTE-RV, and EUS-RV. Interval ERCP has a high success rate and lower adverse event rate, making it the preferred salvage therapy choice.
Therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) begins with successful biliary cannulation. However, it is not always be successful. The failure of the initial ERCP is attributed to two main aspects: the papilla/biliary orifice is endoscopically accessible, or it is inaccessible. When the papilla/biliary orifice is accessible, bile duct cannulation failure can occur even with advanced cannulation techniques, including double guidewire techniques, transpancreatic sphincterotomy, needle-knife precut papillotomy, or fistulotomy. There is currently no consensus on the next steps of treatment in this setting. Therefore, this review aims to propose and discuss potential endoscopic options for patients who have failed ERCP due to difficult bile duct cannulation. These options include interval ERCP, percutaneous-transhepatic-endoscopic rendezvous procedures (PTE-RV), and endoscopic ultrasound-assisted rendezvous procedures (EUS-RV). The overall success rate for interval ERCP was 76.3% (68%-79% between studies), and the overall adverse event rate was 7.5% (0-15.9% between studies). The overall success rate for PTE-RV was 88.7% (80.4%-100% between studies), and the overall adverse event rate was 13.2% (4.9%-19.2% between studies). For EUS-RV, the overall success rate was 82%-86.1%, and the overall adverse event rate was 13%-15.6%. Because interval ERCP has an acceptably high success rate and lower adverse event rate and does not require additional expertise, facilities, or other specialists, it can be considered the first choice for salvage therapy. EUS-RV can also be considered if local experts are available. For patients in urgent need of biliary drainage, PTE-RV should be considered.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据