4.5 Article

Textile dyeing wastewater treatment by Penicillium chrysogenum: design of a sustainable process

期刊

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 86, 期 2, 页码 292-301

出版社

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2022.204

关键词

bioreactor; fungus; sustainable bioprocess; textile wastewater

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the degradation of DB22 by Penicillium chrysogenum through a parametric study and bench bioreactor degradation test. Different carbon sources and their optimum initial concentrations were studied, and the effect of different immobilization supports on DB22 degradation was evaluated. The reuse of attached biomass and the performance of a bench scale bioreactor were also tested.
In this work a parametric study and a bench bioreactor degradation test of Direct Black 22 (DB22) by Penicillium chrysogenum was performed as a first approach to an industrial application, framed within a policy of sustainable processes development. Three ancillary carbon sources and their optimum initial concentrations were studied. These were: glucose, potato starch and potato industry wastewater. Their optimum initial concentration was 6 g/L. The use of potato starch as co-substrate showed the highest decolorization rate and COD removal. Degradation of DB22 using different immobilization supports (stainless steel sponge, loofah sponge and polyethylene strips) was studied and the results showed that the time needed for the treatment decreased from 6 to 4 d. Phytotoxicity was evaluated in the final products of the immobilized cells assays, using Lactuca sativa seeds. For all treatments phytoxicity was reduced with respect to the untreated wastewater, except for the assays using polyethylene strips. Finally, the reuse of the biomass attached to different carriers and the performance of the treatment of DB22 in.a 1 L bench scale bioreactor were tested. P. chrysogenum decolorized at least four sucesives reuses. The reactor assays showed a better performance of the treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据