4.7 Editorial Material

Hydrological Shifts Threaten Water Resources

期刊

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
卷 58, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021WR031210

关键词

water resources; climate change; hydrological shifts; rainfall runoff models

资金

  1. Australian Research Council (ARC) [LP170100598]
  2. ARC [DE180100550, LP180100796]
  3. Department of Environment, Land, Water and Planning of the State of Victoria, Australia
  4. University of Melbourne's Research Computing Services and the Petascale Campus Initiative
  5. Australian Research Council [DE180100550, LP180100796] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent changes in the hydrological behavior of natural watersheds pose challenges for water planning under climate change. Future droughts may induce unexpected hydrological responses, and commonly used hydrological models cannot accurately represent these shifts in behavior. It is now necessary for hydrologists to determine the underlying causes of shifting behavior and incorporate more dynamic realism into operational models.
Recent shifts in the hydrological behavior of natural watersheds suggest acute challenges for water planning under climate change. Usually triggered by a multi-year drought, these shifts involve a tendency for less annual streamflow for a given annual precipitation, and this behavior has now been reported on multiple continents. Future drying under climate change may induce similar unexpected hydrological responses, and this commentary discusses the implications for water planning and management. Commonly used hydrological models poorly represent these shifts in behavior and cannot be relied upon to anticipate future changes. Thus, their use may result in underestimation of hydroclimatic risk and exposure to surprise reductions in water supply, relative to projections. The onus is now on hydrologists to determine the underlying causes of shifting behavior and incorporate more dynamic realism into operational models.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据