4.2 Article

Satellite evidence for no change in terrestrial latent heat flux in the Three-River Headwaters region of China over the past three decades

期刊

JOURNAL OF EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE
卷 125, 期 6, 页码 1245-1253

出版社

INDIAN ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1007/s12040-016-0732-8

关键词

Terrestrial latent heat flux; Three-River Headwaters region; incident solar radiation; precipitation

资金

  1. Natural Science Fund of China [41201331, 41331173]
  2. High Resolution Earth Observation Systems of National Science and Technology Major Projects [05-Y30B02-9001-13/15-9]
  3. Science & Technology Innovation Fund for Remote Sensing Young Talents of NRSCC [KJHX2015372]
  4. National High Technology Research and Development Program of China [2013AA122801]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Terrestrial latent heat flux (LE) in the Three-River Headwaters region (TRHR) of China plays an essential role in quantifying the amount of water evaporation and carbon sink over the high altitude Tibetan Plateau (TP). Global warming is expected to accelerate terrestrial hydrological cycle and to increase evaporation. However, direct field observations are lacking in this region and the long-term variability in LE remains uncertain. In this study, we have revised a semi-empirical Penman LE algorithm based on ground eddy covariance (EC) observations from an alpine grass site and provided new satellite-based evidence to assess LE change in the TRHR during 1982-2010. Our results show that the average annual terrestrial LE in the TRHR is about 38.8 W/m (2) and there is no statistically significant change in annual LE from 1982 to 2010. We also found that during the same time period, terrestrial LE over the east region of the TRHR significantly decreased, on average, by 0.7 W/m (2) per decade, which was driven primarily by the surface incident solar radiation (R (s) ) limitation, offsetting the increased LE over the west region of the TRHR caused by the increased precipitation (P) and soil moisture (SM).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据