4.3 Article

Effect of sow mass vaccination against Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae on the humoral immune response of newborn piglets

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11250-022-03266-9

关键词

Serology; Gilts; Sow farm; Blanket vaccination

资金

  1. CNPq
  2. Capes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the effect of mass vaccination with Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae on the humoral response of sows and their offspring. The results showed that mass vaccination resulted in a more robust serologic response in primiparous sows, which could be the main target for vaccination strategies in the breeding herd.
Pneumonia caused by Mycoplasma (M.) hyopneumoniae is one of the major respiratory diseases in swine production. Commercial vaccines for M. hyopneumoniae are widely used in weaned piglets to reduce lung lesions and clinical signs in the downstream flow; however, no information regarding the effect of mass immunization of the breeding herd is available. The aim of this work was to evaluate a mass vaccination protocol for M. hyopneumoniae on the humoral response of sows and their offspring 24 h post-partum (trial registration number 40156). A total of 52 sows from two different farms (13 primiparous and 13 multiparous sows on each farm), one with mass vaccination (MVF) and one without mass vaccination against M. hyopneumoniae (control farm (CF)) were enrolled in this study. Five piglets from each litter were selected, resulting in 260 piglets. Blood was collected from sows and piglets 24 h post-partum for M. hyopneumoniae antibody detection by ELISA. The results showed that primiparous sows from MVF had higher antibody titers compared to multiparous sows of the same farm, and multiparous and primiparous sows from the CF. Similar results were evidenced in their offspring. The findings of this study suggest that mass vaccination results in a more robust serologic response on primiparous sows, which could be the main target of vaccination strategies for the breeding herd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据