4.7 Review

The COVID misinfodemic: not new, never more lethal

期刊

TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 948-958

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.tim.2022.07.004

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) /National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases/National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute/National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases [RO1 HL117715, R01 HL123096, R01 HL154862, R01 DK130481, R01 DK113919, R01 DK119936, R01 DK131476, R01 AI119346]
  2. National Center for Research Resources of the NIH [P51 OD011104]
  3. Office of Research Infrastructure Programs (ORIP) of the NIH [P51 OD011104]
  4. NIH
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  6. National Cancer Institute

向作者/读者索取更多资源

'Infodemia' refers to the widespread and rapid dissemination of information, misinformation, and disinformation about a specific subject. This phenomenon makes it difficult for the public to distinguish between accurate and false information, eroding trust in scientists and governments and creating barriers to pandemic control. Therefore, it is important to prioritize measures to address future misinfodemics.
'Infodemia' is a portmanteau between 'information' and 'epidemics', referring to wide and rapid accumulation and dissemination of information, misinformation, and disinformation about a given subject, such as a disease. As facts, rumors and fears mix and disperse, the misinfodemic creates loud background noise, preventing the general public from discerning between accurate and false information. We compared and contrasted key elements of the AIDS and COVID-19 misinfodemics, to identify common features, and, based on experience with the AIDS pandemic, recommend actions to control and reverse the SARS-CoV-2 misinfodemic that contributed to erode the trust between the public and scientists and governments and has created barriers to control of COVID-19. As pandemics emerge and evolve, providing robust responses to future misinfodemics must be a priority for society and public health.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据