4.4 Article

Influence of Internal and External Pressure Sensing on Green Travel Intention: Based on a Theoretical Model of the Theory of Planned Behavior and Pressure-state-response Model

期刊

TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD
卷 2677, 期 2, 页码 958-972

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/03611981221110227

关键词

green travel intention; individual policy cognition; sensitivity to environmental problems; PSR-TPB

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Understanding the factors and mechanisms that affect environmentally sustainable travel behavior is important for energy conservation and emission reduction. This study found that attitudes, perceived behavior control, and subjective norms have significant impacts on green travel intentions. Additionally, urban residents' cognitions of external and internal pressures also affect their intentions towards green travel.
Factors that affect environmentally sustainable travel behavior (or green travel) and their mechanisms of action are important to understand to conserve energy and reduce emissions. We constructed a model by integrating the theory of planned behavior (TPB) and the pressure-state-response (PSR) model with individual cognition of green travel policies (external pressure) and sensitivity of environmental problems (internal pressure). Then, an empirical study of 796 urban residents in eastern China was conducted. The results show that, with regard to the TPB, attitude has a direct and significant impact on self-practiced and interpersonal intentions, while perceived behavior control has a similar effect on self-practiced green travel intentions. Further, our results also indicate that subjective norms have indirect influence on both self-practiced and interpersonal intentions by affecting attitudes. With regard to the PSR model, urban residents' cognitions of external and internal pressures affect their green travel intentions in various ways. Based on the results, some relevant policy recommendations aimed at promoting green travel are proposed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据