4.7 Review

Misidentification of PVC microplastics in marine environmental samples

期刊

TRAC-TRENDS IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2022.116649

关键词

PVC; Polymer misidentification; Infrared spectrometry; Microplastics weathering

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The low percentages of PVC reported in academic studies may be due to various factors, highlighting the need for suitable spectroscopic databases that include PVC weathered standards.
Poly(vinylchloride), PVC, is the third most demanded polymer in Europe although its presence in marine ecosystems, surprisingly, is scarcely observed. This does not reflect neither its production nor its widespread usage. Therefore, it is imperative to understand why this may happen. PVC is the least stable of the high-tonnage produced polymers as it has the highest sensitivity towards UV radiation and, therefore, photo-degradation is of maximum relevance. The big amount of additives included in PVC formulations, weathering and the different treatments required to isolate it from environmental samples can modify the surface of PVC microplastics, making their spectral identification/quantification an analytical challenge. All these factors can lead to large PVC underestimations in environmental studies, in which other polymers like PE, PP or PS outstand. Further, the fact that the infrared spectrum of weathered PVC can be confounded with that of PE is of most relevance and, therefore, remarkable misidentifications and/or wrong quantifications may occur. In this work some relevant factors that can explain the low percentages of PVC reported in the literature are discussed and special emphasis is made on the need for suitable spectroscopic databases that include PVC weathered standards. This has been confirmed by the results of a detailed study of PVC weathering under pilot-scale conditions, monitoring its spectroscopic and physical changes over time. ?? 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据