4.2 Article

Grape seed extract proanthocyanidin antagonizes aristolochic acid I-induced liver injury in rats by activating PI3K-AKT pathway

期刊

TOXICOLOGY MECHANISMS AND METHODS
卷 33, 期 2, 页码 131-140

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2022.2103479

关键词

Aristolochic acid; liver; toxicity; oxidative stress; grape seed proanthocyanidin extract

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GSPE can antagonize aristolochic acid-induced liver injury by inhibiting hepatocyte apoptosis mediated by the PI3K-AKT pathway.
Aristolochic acid is internationally recognized as a carcinogen. It has been shown that the main toxic mechanism of aristolochic acid on the liver and kidney is the induction of ROS-induced oxidative stress damage. To investigate whether proanthocyanidins (GSPE), a natural antioxidant product from grape seed extract, could antagonize AA-I-induced liver injury. Thirty-two SD rats were selected and divided into aristolochic acid exposure group (AA-I), normal control group, GSPE group and GSPE intervention group. The protective effects of GSPE on AA-I liver injury were evaluated by examining the body weight, liver index, liver function and liver pathological sections of rats. The results of body weight, liver index, liver function and liver pathological sections of rats showed that GSPE had antagonistic effects on AA-I-induced liver injury. antioxidant enzyme activity in the GSPE intervention group was significantly higher than that in the aristolochic acid group, apoptotic cells were significantly lower than that in the aristolochic acid group, protein and mRNA expression of PI3K-AKT and BCL-2 were significantly higher than that in the aristolochic acid group, BAX, The protein and mRNA expression of BAX, CASPAES-3, CASPAES-9 were significantly lower than those of the aristolochic acid group. GSPE can antagonize aristolochic acid-induced hepatotoxicity, and its mechanism of action is to antagonize aristolochic acid I-induced liver injury by inhibiting PI3K-AKT pathway-mediated hepatocyte apoptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据