4.7 Article

Oral subacute nephrotoxicity of aristololactam I in rats

期刊

TOXICOLOGY
卷 475, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2022.153228

关键词

Aristolactam I; Subacute nephrotoxicity; Intragastric administration; Renal inflammation; Aristolochic acid I

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFC1711000]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the nephrotoxicity of aristolactam I (AL I), a metabolite of aristolochic acids (AAs). The results showed that oral administration of AL I caused renal damage, especially after long-term exposure. However, AL I was less nephrotoxic than aristolochic acid.
Aristolactams (ALs) have been recognized as one kind of metabolites of aristolochic acids (AAs), the nephrotoxic components of Aristolochiaceae plants, and are more widely distributed than AAs in herbal medicines. This study evaluated the oral subacute nephrotoxicity of aristolactam I (AL I), a representative compound of ALs. AL I was intragastrically administered to rats at 20 mg.kg(-1).d(-1) for 10 or 20 days, with aristolochic acid I (AA I) used as positive control at the same dose. After 10-day treatment, AL I led to a significant increase in early renal injuryrelated indices in urine and obvious histopathological lesions in kidneys, including degeneration of tubular epithelial cells, inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrosis. The lesions induced by AL I were significantly aggravated after 20-day exposure. However, AL I induced less histopathological damage in kidneys than AA I in both 10- and 20-day groups. Our results indicated that oral AL I caused nephrotoxicity by inducing oxidative stress, inflammation, and overactivation of the complement system as AA I did. Three detected apoptosisassociated indicators were not affected by AL I but remarkably increased by AA I. In summary, oral AL I induced evident renal damage in rats after only 10 days of treatment, and the damage was aggravated after 20 days. However, AL I was obviously less nephrotoxic than AA I via oral gavage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据