4.4 Article

Photodegradation of Rhodamine B and Bisphenol A Over Visible-Light Driven Bi7O9I3-and Bi12O17Cl2-Photocatalysts Under White LED Irradiation

期刊

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
卷 65, 期 9-12, 页码 1028-1044

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-022-01689-0

关键词

Photocatalysis; Visible light; LED; Bismuth oxyhalides; Bisphenol A; Rhodamine B

资金

  1. HiWater/SENESCyT
  2. HiWater: Efficient and affordable water treatment technologies to minimise waterborne diseases'' consortium [SENESCyT: EULACHT02-0143]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two different bismuth oxyhalides photocatalysts, Bi7O9I3 and Bi12O17Cl2, were synthesized and their catalytic properties for pollutant degradation were investigated. Bi12O17Cl2 exhibited higher mineralization rates for both Rhodamine B and Bisphenol A, while Bi7O9I3 showed effective removal of Rhodamine B even in the dark.
Two different bismuth oxyhalides photocatalysts Bi7O9I3 and Bi12O17Cl2 were obtained by oil bath and hydrothermal methods. The micro/nano-structures obtained were characterized by XRD, SEM, DRS and XPS. The XRD patterns are identical to those already reported. SEM revealed the formation of hierarchical micro/nano structures for Bi7O9I3 and nanobelts for Bi12O17Cl2. Band gap values were determined for both catalysts from DRS and XPS data. The photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B and Bisphenol A were studied with both bismuth oxyhalides and compared with commercial titanium dioxide (TiO2). As light source was used a white Light-Emiting Diode lamp. As expected, a poor photocatalytic degradation was obtained in presence of TiO2, but significant drops of concentrations in presence of the bismuth oxyhalides was observed. However, the mineralization of both polluntants was higher in presence of Bi12O17Cl2 than with Bi7O9I3. In addition, a great part of Rhodamine B was removed by Bi7O9I3 in the dark, which is attributed to its morphological features. In contrast, Bisphenol A was degraded under visible light irradiation without significant adsorption.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据