4.4 Article

A New Insight Over Oxygen Storage Capacity, SMSI, and Dispersion Effects on VOC Oxidation using Pt/Al2O3-CeO2 Catalysts

期刊

TOPICS IN CATALYSIS
卷 65, 期 13-16, 页码 1530-1540

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11244-022-01680-9

关键词

Pt; Al2O3-CeO2; Toluene oxidation; Oxygen storage capacity (OSC); Oxygen buffering capacity (OBC); Strong metal-support interaction (SMSI)

资金

  1. Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana (UAM)
  2. Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia (CONACyT)
  3. Universidad Veracruzana (UV)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the correlation between ceria loading in Pt/Al2O3-CeO2 catalysts and the catalytic activity of 1-butanol and toluene oxidation. It is found that the SMSI effect, Pt particle size, and the capacity to store/release oxygen have complex relationships with VOC oxidation activity.
In this work, a correlation between ceria loading (0, 2, 5, 10, 20, 50 wt%) in Pt/Al2O3-CeO2 catalysts with the catalytic activity of 1-butanol and toluene oxidation is presented. The materials were characterized by TPR, CO chemisorption and TEM; additionally, the capacity to store/release oxygen was determined with the OBC technique in a transient state. The interaction of the CeO2 species with the active phase was obtained by TPR experiments, which were complemented with CO chemisorption and TEM analyses, to understand the SMSI effect and Pt dispersion in the different catalysts. A complex relation between SMSI, Pt particle size and the capacity to store/release oxygen with the activity in VOC oxidation was found. It is concluded that using Pt/Al2O3-CeO2 in deep oxidation of 1-butanol and toluene, the light-off temperature (50% conversion) is reduced with higher values of OBC and Pt dispersion, but to reach 100% of toluene removal, it is necessary to have lower SMSI effect and lower Pt dispersion. The results show that the best catalytic performance, for 50 and 100% conversion, was obtained with the material with 5% CeO2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据