4.7 Article

Detection of explosives in vapor phase by field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometry with dopant-assisted laser ionization

期刊

TALANTA
卷 245, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123414

关键词

Explosives detection; Field asymmetric ion mobility spectrometer; ( FAIMS); Laser ionization; Dopants

资金

  1. RFBR (Russian Foundation for Basic Research) [19-32-90280]
  2. National Research Nu-clear University Moscow Engineering Physics Institute (NRNU MEPhI) [2030]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the sensing capability of the FAIMS detector for nitro-explosives using dopants toluene and 1-methylnaphtalene combined with ultraviolet laser ionization. The results demonstrate that the presence of dopants leads to a significant increase in ion yield at lower laser intensities. Dopant-assisted laser ionization improves the limits of detection, suggesting a potential way to enhance the sensitivity of detectors and improve the portability of laser-based FAIMS prototypes.
Detection of low-volatile explosives in concentrations below 10-14 g/cm3 is a great challenge for portable ion mobility spectrometers (IMS) and field asymmetric IMS (FAIMS). We study the capabilities of FAIMS detector with ultraviolet laser ionization combined with organic additives (dopants) toluene and 1-methylnaphtalene to sense nitro-explosives: trinitrotoluene (TNT) and low-volatile cyclonite (RDX) and nitropentaerythritol (PETN). Differential mobility coefficients were measured for target ion peaks of TNT, RDX and PETN. Presence of dopants in the sample results in multiple growth of ion yield at laser intensities lower than 2 x 107 W/cm2. Limits of detection with dopant-assisted laser ionization were determined: 4.7 x 10-16 g/cm3 for RDX and 9.8 x 10-15 g/ cm3 for PETN. Obtained results propose a way to further improve sensitivity of detectors along with improvement of portability of current laser-based FAIMS prototypes by using less powerful and smaller lasers.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据