4.7 Review

Review of COVID-19 testing and diagnostic methods

期刊

TALANTA
卷 244, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123409

关键词

COVID-19 tests; SARS CoV-2; Antibody to SARS-CoV-2; RT-PCR of SARS CoV-2; CRISPR; LAMP; ELISA; CLIA; Rapid detection; CT scanning; Ultrasound scanning; Time to results; False positive results; False negative results; Lateral flow immunoassays

资金

  1. Nazarbayev University Faculty Development Competitive Research [11022021FD2907]
  2. Nazarbayev University Faculty Development Competitive Research grant [11022021FD2907]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

More than six billion tests for COVID-19 have been conducted worldwide. This article emphasizes the importance of testing for the SARS-CoV-2 virus and corresponding human antibodies, not only for medical diagnosis and treatment, but also for economic and social activities. The review discusses the parameters of these tests and compares different detection methods. While RT-PCR remains the gold standard, there is a need for alternative methods that are less expensive and more accessible.
More than six billion tests for COVID-19 has been already performed in the world. The testing for SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-2) virus and corresponding human antibodies is essential not only for diagnostics and treatment of the infection by medical institutions, but also as a pre-requisite for major semi-normal economic and social activities such as international flights, off line work and study in offices, access to malls, sport and social events. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, time to results and cost per test are essential parameters of those tests and even minimal improvement in any of them may have noticeable impact on life in the many countries of the world. We described, analyzed and compared methods of COVID-19 detection, while representing their parameters in 22 tables. Also, we compared test performance of some FDA approved test kits with clinical performance of some non-FDA approved methods just described in scientific literature. RT-PCR still remains a golden standard in detection of the virus, but a pressing need for alternative less expensive, more rapid, point of care methods is evident. Those methods that may eventually get developed to satisfy this need are explained, discussed, quantitatively compared. The review has a bioanalytical chemistry prospective, but it may be interesting for a broader circle of readers who are interested in understanding and improvement of COVID-19 testing, helping eventually to leave COVID-19 pandemic in the past.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据