4.7 Article

Electrochemical sensor for enzymatic lactate detection based on laser-scribed graphitic carbon modified with platinum, chitosan and lactate oxidase

期刊

TALANTA
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123492

关键词

Laser scribed graphitic carbon; Electrochemical biosensors; Lactate oxidase; Lactate sensing; Bendable substrates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We developed a flexible laser scribed graphitic carbon based lactate biosensor with good working and storage stability for lactate detection.
We developed a flexible laser scribed graphitic carbon based lactate biosensor fabricated using a low cost 450 nm laser. We demonstrated a facile fabrication method involving electrodeposition of platinum followed by two casting steps for modification with chitosan and lactate oxidase. The biosensor demonstrated chronoamperometric lactate detection within a linear range from 0.2 mM to 3 mM, (R-2 > 0.99), with a limit of detection of 0.11 mM and a sensitivity of 35.8 mu A/mM/cm(2). The biosensor was successful in performing up to 10 consecutive measurements (one after the other) indicating good working stability (RSD <5%). Concerning storage stability, there was no decrease in signal response after 30 days of storage at 4 degrees C. Additionally, we demonstrate enzymatic lactate detection whilst the flexible polyimide substrates were fixed at a curvature (K) of 0.14 mm 1. No noticeable change in signal response was observed in comparison to calibrations obtained at a curvature of 0 mm 1, signifying potential opportunities for sensor attachment or integration with oral-care products such as mouth swabs. Both laser scribed graphitic carbon and Ag/AgCl modified-laser scribed graphitic carbon were successful as reference electrodes for chronoamperometric lactate measurements. Furthermore, using a three-electrode configuration on polyimide, lactate detection in both artificial saliva and sterile human serum samples was achieved for two spiked concentrations (0.5 mM and 1 mM).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据