4.7 Article

An aptasensing platform for detection of heat shock protein 70 kDa (HSP70) using a modified gold electrode with lady fern-like gold (LFG) nanostructure

期刊

TALANTA
卷 246, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123511

关键词

Aptasensor; Heat shock protein 70 kDa (HSP70); Electrochemical detection; Gold nanostructure; Surface modification; Bioanalysis

资金

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation - FAPESP [2019/27021-4, 2017/131375, 2014/50867-3]
  2. National Council for Research CNPq [311847-2018-8, 465389/2014-7]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the first aptasensor for detecting HSP70 was developed using a modified gold electrode with lady fern-like gold nanostructure. The aptasensor showed high sensitivity and selectivity, and could detect HSP70 in a wide linear range.
Early diagnosis of diseases depends on accessibility and the ability to detect associated biomarkers. Using aptamers and equipping signal transducers with nanomaterials have facilitated, accelerated, and provided sensitive and selective nanoaptasensors. In this study, the first aptasensor to detect heat shock protein 70 kDa (HSP70) has been developed by applying a modified gold electrode (GE) with the lady fern-like gold (LFG) nanostructure. The nanostructure solution contained HAuCl4, H2SO4, and histamine and was electrochemically synthesized on the surface of the GE with an average size of similar to 20 nm. The analysis to find the optimized time for immobilization of aptamer (a single-stranded RNA) as the biorecognition element on the surface of the working electrode was performed using the open-circuit potential (OCP) technique. This aptasensor could detect HSP70 in a linear range from 0.05 to 75 ng mL(-1) with the limit of detection (LOD) similar to 0.02 ng mL(-1). In order to find out about the performance of the designed aptasensor, other analytical analyses for knowing about the figure of metrics were shadowed through reproducibility, stability, regeneration, selectivity, accuracy, and precision experiments.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据