4.6 Review

Selective intraoperative cholangiography should be considered over routine intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09267-x

关键词

Cholecystectomy; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Cholangiography; IOC; Bile duct injury; BDI

类别

资金

  1. University of Szeged
  2. Economic Development and Innovation Operational Programme (Competence Centre for Health Data Analysis, Data Utilization and Smart Device and Technology Development at the University of Pecs) - European Union [GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00048 -STAY ALIVE, GINOP-2.3.4-15-2020-00010]
  3. Human Resources Development Operational Programme Grant (Comprehensive Development for Implementing Smart Specialization Strategies at the University of Pecs) - European Union [EFOP-3.6.1.-16-201600004]
  4. European Social Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reviewed and analyzed the literature on the use of intraoperative cholangiography during cholecystectomy. The findings suggest that routine cholangiography does not have a clear advantage over selective cholangiography in decreasing bile duct injury. Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in bile duct injury, retained stone rate, readmission rate, and length of hospital stay between cholecystectomy with and without cholangiography. However, the no cholangiography group had a higher risk of conversion to open surgery and a longer operation time.
Background Decades of debate surround the use of intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) during cholecystectomy. To the present day, the role of IOC is controversial as regards decreasing the rate of bile duct injury (BDI). We aimed to review and analyse the available literature on the benefits of IOC during cholecystectomy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed until 19 October 2020 in five databases using the following search keys: cholangiogra* and cholecystectomy. The primary outcomes were BDI and retained stone rate. To investigate the differences between the groups (routine IOC vs selective IOC and IOC vs no IOC), we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes and relative risks (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results Of the 19,863 articles, 38 were selected and 32 were included in the quantitative synthesis. Routine IOC showed no superiority compared to selective IOC in decreasing BDI (RR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.66; 1.24). Comparing IOC and no IOC, no statistically significant differences were found in the case of BDI, retained stone rate, readmission rate, and length of hospital stay. We found an increased risk of conversion rate to open surgery in the no IOC group (RR = 0.64, CI 0.51; 0.78). The operation time was significantly longer in the IOC group compared to the no IOC group (WMD = 11.25 min, 95% CI 6.57; 15.93). Conclusion Our findings suggest that IOC may not be indicated in every case, however, the evidence is very uncertain. Further good quality research is required to address this question.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据