4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Early postoperative complications after gastric bypass revisional surgery in patients with previous sleeve gastrectomy versus primary gastric bypass

期刊

SURGERY FOR OBESITY AND RELATED DISEASES
卷 18, 期 10, 页码 1246-1252

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.05.028

关键词

Bariatric surgery; Postoperative complications; Gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study compared the early postoperative complications of revisional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery (RYGB-RS) after primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG-1) with primary RYGB (RYGB-1). The results showed no differences in the frequency, severity, emergency visits, or readmissions of complications between the two groups.
Background: Revisional bariatric surgery (RS) is indicated if there is weight regain or insufficient weight loss, no improvement or reappearance of co-morbidities, or previous bariatric surgery complications. It has been associated with higher postoperative morbidity. Objective: To evaluate the early postoperative complications (<30 d) of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass RS (RYGB-RS) after primary sleeve gastrectomy (SG-1) compared with primary RYGB (RYGB-1) at a bariatric surgery referral center. Setting: Department of General and Digestive Surgery of General Universitary Hospital of Alicante, Spain. Methods: Retrospective cohort study comparing RYGB-RS after SG-1 and RYGB-1 between January 2008 and March 2021. Postoperative complications, hospital stay, mortality, and readmissions were analyzed. Results: Six hundred and twenty-eight RYGB surgeries (48 RYGB-RS, 580 RYGB-1) were studied. The mean age of patients undergoing RYGB-RS was 50 years, compared with 46 years in the RYGB-1 group (P = .017). Mean initial body mass index was 44.2 kg/m(2) (RYGB-RS) versus 47.6 kg/m(2) (RYGB-1; P = .004). Cardiovascular risk factors were higher in the RYGB-1 group (P < .05). Indications for RS were weight regain or insufficient weight loss (72.9%), weight regain or insufficient weight loss plus gastroesophageal reflux disease (14.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (12.5%). There were no differences in the frequency of complications (RYGB-RS 22.9% vs RYGB-1 20.5%) or in their severity (Clavien-Dindo >= IIIa; RYGB-RS 10.4% vs RYGB-1 6.4%; P > .05). There were no differences in emergency room visits (RYGB-RS at 12.5% vs RYGB-1 at 14.9%) or in readmissions (RYGB-RS at 12.5% vs RYGB-1 at 9.4%). Conclusion: No differences were observed between primary RYGB and revisional RYGB in early morbidity, mortality, emergencies, or readmissions. Revisional bariatric surgery is a safe procedure at referral centers and must be done by expert hands. (c) 2022 American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据