4.7 Article

Surface hardness and corrosion behavior of laser surface-alloyed Ti6Al4V with copper

期刊

SURFACE & COATINGS TECHNOLOGY
卷 444, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2022.128663

关键词

Lasersurfacealloying; Ti6Al4V; Copper; Hardness; Corrosion

资金

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund (FDCT) of Macau SAR [0139/2020/A3]
  2. Institute for the Development and Quality, Macau

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, laser surface alloying of Ti6Al4V with different Cu contents was achieved using a high-power diode laser. It was found that higher Cu content resulted in finer grain size, more intermetallic phases (IMPs) formed, and increased hardness. Corrosion behavior study showed that the specimen alloyed with 6 wt% Cu exhibited mild micro-galvanic effect, while the specimen with 17 wt% Cu had the lowest corrosion resistance due to significant micro-galvanic effect between the IMPs and the matrix.
Laser surface alloying of Ti6Al4V with different Cu contents (6, 8, 13 and 17 wt%) was successfully achieved using a high-power diode laser. With a higher Cu content, the grain size of the laser surface-alloyed Ti6Al4V specimens became finer, with more intermetallic phases (IMPs) formed and the hardness increased up to 646 +/- 18 HV0.2. Potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were conducted to study the corrosion behavior of the laser surface-alloyed specimens in a 0.9 wt% NaCl solution at 37 degrees C. It was found that the specimen alloyed with 6 wt% Cu showed the mild micro-galvanic effect between CuTi2 and alpha-Ti. The specimen with 17 wt% Cu had the highest content of IMPs and possessed the lowest corrosion resistance due to the most significant micro-galvanic effect between the IMPs (cathode) and the alpha-T / beta-Ti matrix (anodes). With an appropriate Cu content, laser surface-alloyed Ti6Al4V can also act as hard and corrosion resistant components possessing a high anti-bacterial efficacy by virtue of Cu.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据