4.6 Article

Comprehensive assessment during palliative radiotherapy consultation optimizes supportive care for patients with advanced breast cancer

期刊

SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 8339-8347

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07246-5

关键词

Palliative radiotherapy; Rapid access; Multidisciplinary; Supportive care

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Assessment for palliative radiotherapy (PRT) by a dedicated multidisciplinary team provides a comprehensive picture of patient needs and streamlines PRT delivery.
Purpose Palliative radiotherapy (PRT) in advanced cancer improves symptom control and quality of life. PRT consultations take place in various clinical settings, including through dedicated rapid access clinics. We examined holistic assessment and PRT delivery by consultation setting. Methods We analyzed patients with breast cancer who died (01/04/2013-31/03/2014), after at least one lifetime PRT consultation. Data abstracted included Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System Revised (ESAS-r) ratings, and PRT timelines. Descriptive statistics, t tests of proportions, independent t tests, and chi-square tests were calculated. Results One hundred thirty patients were assessed for PRT over 224 consults, 28/224 (12.5%) in the rapid access clinic. In non-rapid access versus rapid access visits, KPS was documented in 30.1% versus 89.3%, and medication history in 53.6% versus 96.4%, respectively (both p < 0.0001). Baseline ESAS-r scores were available for 67.9% of rapid access visits, versus no non-rapid access visit. Rapid access consults had a higher proportion of subsequent supportive care referrals (46.4% versus 8.2%; p < 0.0001). Same day PRT start occurred in 37% of rapid access versus 23.4% of non-rapid access visits (p = 0.13). Conclusions Assessment for PRT by a dedicated multidisciplinary team provides a comprehensive picture of patient needs and streamlines PRT delivery, essential to personalizing supportive care.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据