4.7 Article

Inter-subunit crosstalk via PDZ synergistically governs allosteric activation of proapoptotic HtrA2

期刊

STRUCTURE
卷 30, 期 9, 页码 1307-+

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2022.06.001

关键词

-

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Government of India [BT/HRD/NWBA/37/01/2015]
  2. ACTREC-TMC, India [IEC 162]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates the importance of PDZ domains in the multimodal activation of HtrA2 through the generation of HtrA2 variants with different numbers of PDZs and/or active-site mutations. The study proposes a hypothesis on inter-molecular allosteric cross-talk via PDZs in HtrA2. Structural and computational snapshots also support the role of PDZs in the formation of secondary structural elements and the reorganization of the N-terminal region.
The mitochondrial serine protease High-temperature requirement A2 (HtrA2) is associated with various dis-eases including neurodegenerative disorders and cancer. Despite availability of structural details, the reports on HtrA2's mechanistic regulation that varies with the type of activation signals still remain non-concordant. To expound the role of regulatory PDZ (Postsynaptic density-95/Discs large/Zonula occludens-1) domains in multimodal activation of HtrA2, we generated heterotrimeric HtrA2 variants comprising different numbers of PDZs and/or active-site mutations. Sequential deletion of PDZs from the trimeric ensemble significantly affected its residual activity in a way that proffered a hypothesis advocating inter-molecular allosteric cross-talk via PDZs in HtrA2. Furthermore, structural and computational snapshots affirmed the role of PDZs in secondary structural element formation around the regulatory loops and coordinated reorganization of the N-terminal region. Therefore, apart from providing cues for devising structure-guided therapeutic strategies, this study establishes a physiologically relevant working model of complex allosteric regulation through a trans-mediated shared landscape.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据