4.7 Article

Structural reliability analysis of offshore jackets for system-level fatigue design

期刊

STRUCTURAL SAFETY
卷 97, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.strusafe.2022.102220

关键词

Jackets; System-level design; Reliability-based design; Fatigue; System reliability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Lattice systems, such as offshore jackets and towers, are weight-efficient support structures for wind energy and oil and gas units. However, their lightweight design increases the risk of fatigue failure. Therefore, special attention should be given to the design of fatigue hot spots, and system-level fatigue design methods can improve the system's reliability. In this study, a truncation algorithm is proposed to estimate the system reliability within feasible computational time.
Lattice systems such as offshore jackets and towers are weight-efficient support structures for wind energy and oil and gas units. Nevertheless, their light-weight is achieved at the expense of increasing their proneness to fatigue failure, due to their many welded connections. Consequently, special attention is to be dedicated to the design of the fatigue hot spots. System-level fatigue design methods aim at calibrating the reliability of the fatigue components to achieve a desired target system reliability. These methods rely on the accurate assessment of the system probability of failure, which is computationally demanding due to the statistical dependence among fatigue limit states and the large number of possible deterioration states that need to be taken into account. In the present paper, we develop a novel approach, called the truncation algorithm, to estimate lower and upper bounds of the system reliability due to extreme environmental and fatigue limit states within feasible computational time. The proposed approach is applied to assessing existing system-level fatigue design methods and to study system effects, such as the effects of redundancy and the correlation among fatigue limit states on the system reliability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据