4.7 Article

Drought indicator analysis and forecasting using data driven models: case study in Jaisalmer, India

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-022-02277-0

关键词

SPI; Random Subspace; Random Tree; Subset regression; Sensitivity analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines the feasibility and effectiveness of the Random Subspace (RSS) model and its hybridization with M5 Pruning tree (M5P), Random Forest (RF), and Random Tree (RT) to estimate the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) for droughts in Rajasthan, India.
Agricultural droughts are a prime concern for economies worldwide as they negatively impact the productivity of rain-fed crops, employment, and income per capita. In this study, Standard Precipitation Index (SPI) has been used to evaluate different drought indices for Rajasthan of India. In agricultural, hydrological, and meteorological applications such as irrigation scheduling, crop simulation, water budgeting, reservoir operations, and weather forecasting, the accurate estimation of the drought indices such as the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) plays an important role. Thus, the present study was conducted to examine the feasibility and effectiveness of the Random Subspace (RSS) model and its hybridization with the M5 Pruning tree (M5P), Random Forest (RF), and Random Tree (RT) to estimate the SPI at 3, 6, and 12 droughts during 2000-2019. Performances of RSS and hybridized algorithms were assessed and compared using performance indicators (i.e., MAE, RMSE, RAE, RRSE, and R-2) and various graphical interpretations. Results indicated that the RSS-M5P provided the most accurate SPI prediction (MAE = 0.497, RMSE = 0.682, RAE = 81.88, RRSE = 87.22, and R-2 = 0.507 for SPI-3; MAE = 0.452, RMSE = 0.717, RAE = 69.76, RRSE = 85.24, and R-2 = 0.402 for SPI-6. And MAE = 0.294, RMSE = 0.377, RAE = 55.79, RRSE = 59.57, and R-2 = 0.783 for SPI-12) compare to RSS alone, RSS-RF, and RSS-RT models for study the drought situation in Jaisalmer Rajasthan. The M5P algorithms have improved the performance of the RSS structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据