4.5 Article

Influence of Partial Replacement of Co with Cu on Isothermal Transformation Kinetics in Ferritic/Martensitic Heat- Resistant Steel

期刊

STEEL RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 94, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/srin.202200228

关键词

Co; Cu; heat-resistant steels; isothermal gamma ->alpha transformation; M23C6; time-temperature-transformation diagrams

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigates the effect of partial replacement of Co with Cu on isothermal transformation kinetics in 10Cr-based heat-resistant steels. The results show that the partial replacement of Co with Cu slows down the isothermal transformation kinetics and lowers the nose temperature of transformation.
This study examines the influence of partial replacement of Co with Cu on isothermal transformation kinetics in 10Cr-based heat-resistant steels. Two kinds of heat-resistant steels, having similar chemical compositions except for Co and Cu contents, are prepared and isothermally heat-treated at 710-790 degrees C up to 240 h after austenitization. During isothermal heat treatment, austenite is decomposed via two different reactions, gamma -> alpha + M23C6 and gamma -> alpha; the cellular precipitation (gamma -> alpha + M23C6) nucleates at prior austenite grain boundaries or the interior of prior austenite grains and grows toward the interior of austenite, followed by gamma -> alpha transformation originating from C depletion in the remaining austenite. A time-temperature-transformation diagram exhibits that the partial replacement of Co with Cu not only decelerates the isothermal transformation kinetics but also lowers the nose temperature of transformation. The calculation of the driving forces for the successive reactions reveals that the increase of Cu content predominantly reduces the driving force for both gamma -> alpha + M23C6 and gamma -> alpha reactions, contributing to the lower nose temperature and sluggish transformation kinetics as Co is partially replaced with Cu.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据