4.5 Article

Bayesian local exchangeability design for phase II basket trials

期刊

STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
卷 41, 期 22, 页码 4367-4384

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sim.9514

关键词

adaptive design; Bayesian analysis; clustering; master protocol; oncology

资金

  1. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences [UL1TR001863]
  2. National Institutes of Health [P30-CA16359, P50-CA121974, P50-CA196530, P50-DE030707-01, R01-CA168733, R01-CA177719, R01-CA223481, R01-ES005775, R35-CA197574, R41-A120546, U01-CA235747, U48-DP005023, UM1-CA18668]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes an information borrowing strategy for the design and monitoring of phase II basket trials based on the local multisource exchangeability assumption between baskets. The proposed method is able to maintain the family-wise type I error rate at a reasonable level and has desirable basket-wise power.
We propose an information borrowing strategy for the design and monitoring of phase II basket trials based on the local multisource exchangeability assumption between baskets (disease types). In our proposed local-MEM framework, information borrowing is only allowed to occur locally, that is, among baskets with similar response rate and the amount of information borrowing is determined by the level of similarity in response rate, whereas baskets not considered similar are not allowed to share information. We construct a two-stage design for phase II basket trials using the proposed strategy. The proposed method is compared to competing Bayesian methods and Simon's two-stage design in a variety of simulation scenarios. We demonstrate the proposed method is able to maintain the family-wise type I error rate at a reasonable level and has desirable basket-wise power compared to Simon's two-stage design. In addition, our method is computationally efficient compared to existing Bayesian methods in that the posterior profiles of interest can be derived explicitly without the need for sampling algorithms. R scripts to implement the proposed method are available at .

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据