4.1 Article

Maximum likelihood estimation of missing data probability for nonmonotone missing at random data

期刊

STATISTICAL METHODS AND APPLICATIONS
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 197-209

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10260-022-00650-5

关键词

Curse of dimensionality; Missing at random; Missing data mechanism; Model selection; Nonmonotone missing data patterns; Semiparametric likelihood

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study generalized the semiparametric likelihood model for dealing with nonmonotone missing data patterns with any number of variables. It also introduced a semiparametric estimator for assessing model fit. Simulation studies and an analysis of a specific case-control study demonstrated the practical implementation of the new method.
In general, statistical analysis with missing data requires specification of a model for the missing data probability and/or the covariate distribution. For nonmonotone missing data patterns, modeling and practical estimation of the missing data probability are very challenging. Recently a semiparametric likelihood model was developed to estimate parametric regression models for the missing data mechanism based on all the observed data, which can deal with arbitrary nonmonotone missing data patterns. However, due to the curse of dimensionality in the likelihood-based models, this method becomes impractical if the number of variables increases. This research generalizes the semiparametric likelihood model such that it can deal with any number of variables with arbitrary nonmonotone missing data patterns. It further introduces a semiparametric estimator of the missing data probability for the partially observed data, which can be used to assess the model fit. An EM algorithm with closed form expressions at each step are used to compute the estimates. Simulation studies in various settings indicate that the performance of the new method is acceptable for practical implementation. The missing data mechanism of a case-control study of hip fractures among male veterans is analyzed to illustrate the method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据