4.6 Article

Quantitative detection of trace elemental palladium in automobile exhaust catalysts through electron probe microanalysis

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.sab.2022.106479

关键词

Electron probe microanalysis; Automobile exhaust catalyst; Spent catalyst; Calibration curve

资金

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [21962022]
  2. Major Science and Technology Programs of Yunnan [202002AB080001-1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study employs EPMA technique to determine the trace elemental Pd in automobile exhaust catalysts containing only Pd, and investigates the impact of measurement parameters on the analysis precision. The results demonstrate the significance and potential of this analysis method in the production of exhaust catalysts and the recovery of precious metals.
Automobile exhaust catalysts containing only Pd have significant advantages over other types of catalysts, including exceptionally high activity at low temperatures, superior thermal stability at high temperatures, and resistance to sulfur toxicity. The present study employs the electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) technique to determine the trace elemental Pd in such catalysts. The particle size distribution and homogeneity of Pd in synthesised standard samples were studied after ball milling, which improved the sample uniformity. Furthermore, the impact of measurement parameters on the analysis precision was investigated. It was found that the optimal conditions are an acceleration voltage of 18 kV, a beam current of 140 nA, and a beam spot size of 40 mu m. To avoid potential background interference when choosing background positions in the ZAF method, a calibration curve was established with a correlation coefficient higher than 0.99. This analysis method can be of substantial significance in the production process of automobile exhaust catalysts and in the recovery of precious metals from spent catalysts. Therefore, there is high potential to expand the applications of EPMA in this field.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据