4.7 Article

Probing the stereochemical structure of carenes using Raman and Raman optical activity spectroscopy

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.saa.2022.121176

关键词

2-Carene; 3-Carene; 4-Carene; Pine oil; Raman spectroscopy; ROA spectroscopy; DFT calculations

资金

  1. British Council
  2. Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education
  3. PL-Grid Infrastructure
  4. Faculty of Drilling, Oil and Gas, AGH University of Science and Technology in Krakow, Poland [16.16.190.779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The interest in terpene compounds, including carenes, is due to their biological activity. This study focuses on the potential use of carenes as biofuels or additives in biofuels. The Raman and ROA spectra of different carenes were analyzed, providing valuable knowledge for identifying specific carenes in pine essential oil.
The great interest in terpene compounds such as 2-, 3-and 4-carene is due to their undeniable biological activity. However, in recent years, there has been increasing interest in carenes in the context of biofuels. The current growing and insatiable demand for petroleum fuels creates an area for alternative biofuels. Research shows that natural products, which contain compounds from the carenes family, such as pine oil or turpentine (3-carene can constitute up to 70% of the composition of turpentine), can be successfully used as biofuels or additives in biofuels.In this work, both experimental and calculated (DFT/B3LYP/aug-cc-pVDZ) Raman and ROA (Raman optical activity) spectra of 1S,3R-cis-4-carene and 1S,3S-trans-4-carene were reported and analyzed for the first time. Then these spectra were compared with Raman and ROA spectra of other chiral members of the carenes family (1S-2-carene and 1S-3-carene). This knowledge about the spectra of individual care -nes made it possible to identify (+)-1S-3-carene in selected samples of pine essential oil from the needles of Pinius sylvestris (Scots pine).(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据