4.4 Article

Interference of optical phonons in diamond studied using femtosecond pulses of polarized near-infrared light

期刊

SOLID STATE COMMUNICATIONS
卷 350, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssc.2022.114747

关键词

Coherent optical phonons; Femtosecond pulses; Diamond

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19K03696, 19K22141, 21H04669, 21K18904]
  2. Engi-neering by Joint Inverse Innovation for Materials Architecture, MEXT
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19K22141, 19K03696, 21K18904, 21H04669] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The phononic interference of optical phonons in diamond is investigated using polarization-based pump-probe measurements. It is found that the phonon amplitude can be enhanced or suppressed depending on the polarization of the second pump pulse. These observations are explained using a quantum-mechanical model involving the Raman tensor of the diamond lattice structure. The results provide important insights into the behavior and characteristics of phonons in diamond.
The phononic interference of optical phonons in diamond is studied via transient transmittance change measurements using the double pump-probe protocol with polarized pump pulses. With orthogonal-polarized pulses, the phonon amplitude is enhanced/suppressed if the second pump pulse is irradiated by a halfinteger/integer multiple of the phonon period. This is contrary to the usual phononic interference (enhancement at integer multiples of the phonon period) observed when using parallel-polarized pulses. These observed results are well explained using a quantum-mechanical model in calculations involving the Raman tensor of the diamond lattice structure. The amplitude of the optical phonons generated via the off-diagonal term of Raman tensor is proportional to the product of the x- and y-components of the optical electric field. The phase of the phonon oscillations is dependent on the angle between the crystal orientation and the polarization of the pump pulse.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据