4.6 Article

Discriminative aging subspace learning for age estimation

期刊

SOFT COMPUTING
卷 26, 期 18, 页码 9189-9198

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00500-022-07333-z

关键词

Age estimation; Hidden factor analysis (HFA); Aging manifold; Regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Human age estimation from facial images is a hot research topic in computer vision. This paper proposes a discriminative manifold learning method based on hidden factor analysis (HFA) model, which can effectively extract aging patterns from facial features and achieve high accuracy in age estimation.
Human age estimation from facial images has become an active research topic in computer vision field because of various real-world applications. Temporal property of facial aging display sequential patterns that lie on the low-dimensional aging manifold. In this paper, we propose hidden factor analysis (HFA) model-based discriminative manifold learning method for age estimation. The hidden factor analysis decomposes facial features into independent age factor and identity factor. Various age invariant face recognition systems in the literature utilize identity factor for face recognition; however, the age factor remains unutilized. The age component of the hidden factor analysis model depends on the subject's age. Thus it carries significant age-related information. In this paper, we demonstrate that such aging patterns can be effectively extracted from the HFA-based discriminant subspace learning algorithm. Next, we have applied multiple regression methods on low-dimensional aging features learned from the HFA model. Effect of reduced dimensionality on the accuracy has been evaluated by extensive experiments and compared with the state-of-the-art methods. Effectiveness and robustness in terms of MAE and CS of the proposed framework are demonstrated using experimental analysis on a large-scale aging database MORPH II. The accuracy of our method is found superior to the current state-of-the-art methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据