4.6 Review

Comparison of rapid eye movement without atonia quantification methods to diagnose rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder: a systematic review

期刊

SLEEP
卷 45, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/sleep/zsac150

关键词

diagnostic accuracy; REM sleep behavior disorder; REM sleep without atonia; REM atonia index; meta-analysis

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) [NRF-2020R1C1C1013160]
  2. Brain Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2017M3C7A1029688]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIP) [2017R1A2B2012280]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2017M3C7A1029688] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Manual quantification of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RWA) using chin or phasic flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) activity shows the best diagnostic performance for REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). The automatic REM atonia index (RAI) method may be useful for screening RBD patients.
Study Objectives Rapid eye movement (REM) sleep without atonia (RWA) is essential for diagnosing REM sleep behavior disorder (RBD). Manual and automatic quantifications of RWA that use different criteria have been validated. This study compared the RWA quantification methods for diagnosing RBD. Methods The PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systemically searched for studies published from inception to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies assessing the sensitivity and specificity of RWA quantification methods. Pooled estimates of the sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) were determined. Risk of bias and certainty of evidence was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework, respectively. Results Fourteen articles including 402 patients with RBD met the inclusion criteria. Manual methods evaluating any chin and phasic flexor digitorum superficialis (FDS) activity had the highest DOR (138.8, 95% CI = 21.8% to 881.7%) and AUC (0.9686). The automatic REM atonia index (RAI) showed similar or higher sensitivity (89.1%, 95% CI = 84.6% to 92.7%) but a lower specificity (73.5%), DOR (43.1), and AUC (0.9369) than the manual techniques. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, manual RWA quantification that employed chin or phasic FDS activity had the best RBD diagnostic performance. The automatic RAI method may be useful for screening patients with RBD. The results should be interpreted carefully because of the high risk of bias in patient selection and significant heterogeneity among the studies. PROSPERO Registration number CRD42021276445.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据