4.1 Article

Sexual behaviours and sexual health among middle-aged and older adults in Britain

期刊

SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS
卷 99, 期 3, 页码 173-179

出版社

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-055346

关键词

Sexual Behavior; SEXUAL HEALTH; Sexual Dysfunction; Physiological

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study analyzed the sexual behaviors and health of people aged 45-74 years using data from the 2011 National Attitudes and Sexual Lifestyles Survey in Britain. Four classes of sexual behaviors and health were identified, and these classes can help in providing tailored sexual health services to middle-aged and older adults to improve sexual function and reduce risky behaviors.
Objectives Population-representative studies of the sexual health of middle-aged and older adults are lacking in ageing societies. This study aimed to identify latent patterns of sexual behaviours and health of people aged 45-74 years. Methods We conducted a latent class analysis of the National Attitudes and Sexual Lifestyles Survey (Natsal-3), a nationally representative survey conducted in Britain in 2011. Results Of the 5260 respondents aged 45-74 years, 48.86% of men and 44.91% of women belonged to the Content Caseys class who reported good sexual health. The Infrequent Indigos (30.94% of men, 44.38% of women) were characterised by a lack of sexual activity, reported some dissatisfaction, and were more likely to have a disability. The Low-Functioning Lees (11.65% of men, 8.41% of women) reported some more disability and had issues with sexual functioning and higher levels of distress. The Multiple-Partnered Morgans (8.62% of men, 2.30% of women) were characterised by a greater number of sexual partners and several risk behaviours. Conclusions The use of these four classes can aid in improved targeting of tailored sexual health services to improve sexual function, sexual satisfaction, reduce distress and risky behaviours among middle-aged and older adults. These services should be inclusive of the disabled community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据