4.4 Article

Stryhnos potatorum and Pisum sativum as natural coagulant for meat food processing wastewater treatment: isotherm studies

期刊

SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 58, 期 2, 页码 345-360

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2022.2104732

关键词

Adsorption isotherm; Langmuir model; Freundlich model; natural coagulants

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The flocculation performance of Stryhnos Potatorum and Pisum Sativum as natural coagulants for treating meat food processing wastewater was evaluated. The optimal conditions for both coagulants were found to effectively remove turbidity, TSS, COD, O&G, and color from the wastewater.
This study was to determine the flocculation performance of Stryhnos Potatorum (Nirmali seed) and Pisum Sativum (pea seed) as natural coagulants for treating meat food processing wastewater (MFPW). A lab-scale treatment tank was developed to evaluate the effectiveness of MFPW treatment.The flocculation process was evaluated in relation to adsorbent dosage (30-330 mg/L), pH (4-9) and mixing rate (100-350 rpm). Results showed that optimum dosage, pH and mixing rate for S. Potatorum were pH 8 with the dosage of 150 mg/L and 150 rpm mixing rate with the removal of turbidity, TSS, COD, O&G, and color are 91%, 97.6%, 58.4%, 79.9% and 84.3% respectively. Meanwhile, for P. Sativum, the optimum condition was observed at pH 8 with the dosage of 150 mg/L and 150 rpm mixing rate with the removal of turbidity, TSS, COD, O&G, and color 87.8%, 97.3%, 65.5%, 77.9% and 76.5% respectively. The Langmuir model was found to be the best fit (R-2 > 0.95) for TSS, O&G and color removal from MFPW in both coagulants, compared to the Freundlich model for both natural coagulants. In contrast, the Freundlich isotherms were best described by the removal of turbidity (R-2 = 0.97) and COD (R-2 = 0.93) by using P. Sativum. The findings obtained showed that natural coagulants give an efficient treatment solution for improving MFPW quality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据