4.6 Review

Extended Reality in Neurosurgical Education: A Systematic Review

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 16, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22166067

关键词

extended reality; neurosurgery; education; virtual reality; augmented reality; mixed reality; procedural knowledge; simulation; residents

资金

  1. Innovationsfonden 2022 [FoUI-941760]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Surgical simulation practices using extended reality (XR) technologies have rapidly expanded and proven to enhance neurosurgical education. A systematic review of 31 studies showed solid results, particularly in improving young residents' performance. This review not only enhances understanding of XR in neurosurgical education but also provides valuable insights for future applications.
Surgical simulation practices have witnessed a rapid expansion as an invaluable approach to resident training in recent years. One emerging way of implementing simulation is the adoption of extended reality (XR) technologies, which enable trainees to hone their skills by allowing interaction with virtual 3D objects placed in either real-world imagery or virtual environments. The goal of the present systematic review is to survey and broach the topic of XR in neurosurgery, with a focus on education. Five databases were investigated, leading to the inclusion of 31 studies after a thorough reviewing process. Focusing on user performance (UP) and user experience (UX), the body of evidence provided by these 31 studies showed that this technology has, in fact, the potential of enhancing neurosurgical education through the use of a wide array of both objective and subjective metrics. Recent research on the topic has so far produced solid results, particularly showing improvements in young residents, compared to other groups and over time. In conclusion, this review not only aids to a better understanding of the use of XR in neurosurgical education, but also highlights the areas where further research is entailed while also providing valuable insight into future applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据