4.6 Article

A Method to Evaluate Spectral Analysis by Spectroscopy

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22155638

关键词

detection resolution; organic carbon; sediment; spectrometer; spectral analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32171578, U2006209]
  2. Shandong Natural Science Foundation, China [ZR 2021MD093, ZR2021MD103, ZR2021FQ028]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Visible and near infrared spectroscopy has been widely used to determine organic carbon in soils or sediments. However, there is a lack of method to evaluate the spectral analysis. In this study, a method to evaluate the spectral analysis of SOC was proposed and three spectral models were established using different spectrometers. The results showed that the performance of the spectrometers differed, with the low-cost QEPro performing as well as the high-cost FieldSpec 4.
Visible and near infrared spectroscopy has been widely used to develop a method for rapidly determining organic carbon in soils or sediments (SOC). Most of these studies concentrated on how to establish a good spectral model but ignored how to evaluate the method, such as the use of detection range (max and min), resolution and error for SOC spectral analysis. Here, we proposed a method to evaluate the spectral analysis of SOC. Using 96 sediments sampled in the Yellow Sea and Bohai Sea, China, we established three spectral models of SOC after collecting their spectral reflectance by Agilent Cary 5000, ASD FieldSpec 4 and Ocean Optics QEPro, respectively. For both the calibration set and validation set in each spectrometer, the predicted SOC concentrations followed a distribution curve (function), in which the x-axis was the SOC concentrations. Using these curves, we developed these four technical parameters. The detection ranges were the SOC concentrations where the curve was near to or crossing with the lateral axis, while the detection resolution was the average difference between the two neighboring SOC concentrations. The detection errors were the differences between the predicted SOC and the measured SOC. Results showed that these technical parameters were better in the bench-top spectrometer (Cary 5000) than those in the portable spectrometers when analyzing the same samples. For the portable spectrometers, QEPro had a broader detection range and more consistent detection error than FieldSpec 4, suggesting that the low-cost QEPro performed as well as the high-cost FieldSpec 4. This study provides a good example for evaluating spectral analysis by spectroscopy, which can support the development of the spectral method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据