4.6 Article

A Robotic Experimental Setup with a Stewart Platform to Emulate Underwater Vehicle-Manipulator Systems

期刊

SENSORS
卷 22, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/s22155827

关键词

underwater vehicle-manipulator system; robotics emulator; contact management; remote inspection; force control

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through the ORCA Hub project [EP/R026173/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an experimental robotic setup with a Stewart platform and a robot manipulator to emulate an underwater vehicle-manipulator system. The setup allows for studying control techniques in a dry lab environment, bypassing the difficulties of conducting similar experiments with actual underwater vehicles in water tanks.
This study presents an experimental robotic setup with a Stewart platform and a robot manipulator to emulate an underwater vehicle-manipulator system (UVMS). This hardware-based emulator setup consists of a KUKA IIWA14 robotic manipulator mounted on a parallel manipulator, known as Stewart Platform, and a force/torque sensor attached to the end-effector of the robotic arm interacting with a pipe. In this setup, we use realistic underwater vehicle movements either communicated to a system in real-time through 4G routers or recorded in advance in a water tank environment. In addition, we simulate both the water current impact on vehicle movement and dynamic coupling effects between the vehicle and manipulator in a Gazebo-based software simulator and transfer these to the physical robotic experimental setup. Such a complete setup is useful to study the control techniques to be applied on the underwater robotic systems in a dry lab environment and allows us to carry out fast and numerous experiments, circumventing the difficulties with performing similar experiments and data collection with actual underwater vehicles in water tanks. Exemplary controller development studies are carried out for contact management of the UVMS using the experimental setup.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据